This paper takes a community-centric focus to understand the impetus for making “Applied Jainism” central to the charters of endowed chairs in Jain Studies in the US, Canada, and Europe. It examines the charters of several endowed chairs and compares them with similar discourses found in publications meant for Jain communities in North America, such as Jain Digest. By focusing on the topics and issues enumerated in these documents that “Jainism” or “Jain ethics” may be applied to solve, this paper argues that the ultimate purpose of “Applied Jain Studies” is to bolster an identitarian discourse, that is, a process of asserting what it means to be Jain in the world today, especially in the diaspora. As with all such assertions, these claims are not made in a vacuum, but in the context of sectarian, caste, and class differences that characterize Jain communities in India and abroad. In short, such efforts are assertions of those with the ability to influence universities and other deliberative bodies (such as JAINA) to assert claims that appear to be value free or neutral, but which reinforce the ability for some actors to control the narrative of what it means to be Jain. The paper concludes that this is why some topics—such as environmentalism, animal rights, and food—are treated as acceptable within the parameters of championing ahimsa as a “core value” of Jainism, while other applications of nonviolence—such as human rights, anti-fascism, anti-racism, and anti-casteism—are granted almost no attention in these charters and publications.
Read MoreRead Less